Article information

Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2021;64(9):641-651

Publication date (electronic) : 2021 September 21

doi : https://doi.org/10.3342/kjorl-hns.2021.00458

Marn Joon Park¹, Young Jun Choi², Yong Seok Lee³, Yoo-Sam Chung^,1

¹Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

²Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

³Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

박만준¹, 최영준², 이용석³, 정유삼^,1

¹울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 이비인후과학교실

²울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 영상의학교실

³울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 신경과학교실

Address for correspondence Yoo-Sam Chung, MD, PhD Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea Tel +82-2-3010-3716 Fax +82-2-489-2773 E-mail yschung@amc.seoul.kr

Received 2021 June 2; Revised 2021 July 27; Accepted 2021 August 2.

Trans Abstract

Introduction

The human upper airway is consisted with four anatomical levels; nasopharynx, velopharynx, glossopharynx, and laryngopharynx [1]. Majority of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients are previously studied to have a narrowing of glossopharynx and hypopharynx. Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) is a widely accepted first-line surgical treatment method for resolving OSAS [2]. However, in cases which UPPP fails to resolve OSAS, hypopharyngeal obstruction is accused to be the main reason [3]. Therefore, the importance of manipulation of the base of tongue (BOT) is currently being issued [4-6]. For the reduction of glossopharyngeal narrowing, a midline glossectomy could be an option [5]. In cases which hypopharyngeal narrowing is a problem, manipulation of BOT such as submucosal minimally invasive lingual excision, carbon dioxide laser midline glossectomy, hyoepiglottoplasty, and radiofrequency tissue reduction are accepted methods [4,5,7]. In combination with or without UPPP, the effectiveness of BOT manipulation techniques has been proven in many previous studies [5,7].

In performing volumetric reduction in BOT, the hypoglossal/lingual artery neurovascular bundle (HLNVB) acts as a crucial anatomical hurdle [8]. The lingual arteries are the most vulnerable structure among HLNVB upon performing BOT manipulation, which may result in fatal complications such as massive bleeding and immediate airway obstruction when injured [9]. Many previous studies have focused on the course of the lingual artery and its spatial relation between adjacent anatomical landmarks [6,10-13]. However, there were no single previous study discussing the difference of lingual artery and its relation with the tongue in OSAS patients compared with the normal population.

In Korea, no previous study arguing about the spatial relation between the lingual artery and the tongue in Korean population had ever been reported. With the necessity, the authors aimed to analyze the course of the lingual artery and its relation with the tongue in Korean male adult population.

Subjects and Methods

Metric evaluation of the tongue & the lingual artery

For the measurement of each distance parameters, four landmarks were set as the reference points. The foramen cecum (FC) linguae, a small midline depression on the lingual surface on the border dividing the anterior two-thirds (tongue tip and tongue body) of the tongue and the posterior aspect (base of the tongue) of the tongue, was set as the main landmark in the study. In the sagittal image shown in the obtained CT scan, the dimpling point on the border separating the tongue body and BOT was identified, and defined as “point C” (Fig. 1). Three additional landmarks were defined as following detail; “point A,” located 2 cm anteriorly from point C on the lingual surface; “point B,” located 1 cm anteriorly from point C on the lingual surface; “point D” located 1 cm posteriorly from point C on the lingual surface. In all four points (point A-D), the depth of the lingual artery from the lingual surface of the tongue was measured on the sagittal image, and the width of lingual arteries bilaterally was measured on the axial image (Fig. 2). In the middle anterior half portion of the tongue, the depth and the width of deep lingual artery was measured, and in the posterior half of the tongue, the depth and the width of lingual artery was evaluated. The thickness, width, and length of the tongue were also measured (Fig. 3). Tongue thickness was measured as the distance from the lingual surface at FC level and mental spine on a sagittal image. The maximal width of the tongue shown on a coronal image was considered as the width of the tongue. The distance between the tip and the base of the tongue on a sagittal image was considered as the length of the tongue. All of the measurement process was done by a single specialist (M.J. Park), with the blinding of patients’ clinical information.

Fig. 1.

Establishment of the reference points. A contract-enhanced computed tomography sagittal image of a 33-year-old male patient confirmed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. The lingual artery is visualized, and the depth of the lingual artery from the lingual surface of the tongue at each four reference points (A–D) was measured. Arrowhead; FC. A: 2 cm anterior to FC. B: 1 cm anterior to FC. C: FC. D: 1 cm posterior to FC. FC, foramen cecum.

Fig. 2.

Measuring the depth and the width of the lingual artery. A contract-enhanced computed tomography sagittal image of a 33-year-old male patient confirmed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. A: On the sagittal image, the depth of the lingual artery (arrowline) was measured from the lingual surface of the tongue at the FC level (arrowhead). B: The width of the bilateral lingual arteries was measured at the level of FC (arrowline). FC, foramen cecum.

Fig. 3.

Measurement of the thickness, width, and length of the tongue. A: Tongue thickness was measured as the distance from the lingual surface at foramen cecum level and mental spine on a sagittal image (bold line arrows). The distance between the tip and the base of the tongue on a sagittal image was considered as the length of the tongue (arrow with dotted lines). B: The maximal width of the tongue shown on a coronal image was considered as the width of the tongue.

Results

Metric evaluation of the tongue and its spatial relation with the lingual artery

In OSAS group, the tongue was measured to be significant thicker in depth (p=0.021), wider (p=0.047), and longer (p=0.014) than in the control group. Contrary to the fact that no significant difference in the depth of the lingual artery at the point of FC were seen between OSAS group and control group, a difference in tongue thickness have resulted in significant difference in the relative depth of the lingual artery (p<0.001) at the level of FC, indicating the lingual artery courses shallower in the OSAS group than the control group at the level of FC.

In all four reference points (A to D), the depth between the lingual artery and the tongue was measured, in addition to the measurement of the distance between the bilateral lingual arteries. As shown in Table 1, the OSAS group showed significantly different depth below the lingual surface at point A and B, whereas no significant difference depth was shown in point C and D. The distance between lingual arteries on both sides showed no significant difference in point A in both groups, however OSAS group showed significantly different width of bilateral lingual arteries than the control group at point B, C, and D (p<0.05). When the level of BMI was also matched in addition to the age with the control in 13 subjects, there were no significant differences in the thickness, width, and the length of the tongue, however the relative depth of the lingual artery showed significantly different depth in OSAS group. In both age and BMI matched party, the differences in the width of bilateral lingual arteries have widened with increased statistical significance, however no changes of the depth of the lingual artery were observed when only age was matched. A schematic illustration of the lingual artery and the tongue in OSAS group and control group in sagittal and axial view is shown in Fig. 4.

Table 1.

Metric parameters of the tongue and the lingual artery in OSAS patients compared with normal population

Fig. 4.

A schematic illustration of anatomical difference between age-matched OSAS group and the control group. The average size of the tongue and the course of lingual artery in both OSAS (black lines) and age-sex matched control groups (gray lines) are drawn schematically (total 28 pairs). A: Viewed from the lingual surface. B: Sagittal view. The numbers represent the distance of the lingual artery from the lateral margin (A) or the ventral surface (B) of the tongue. ^*p<0.05. FC, foramen cecum; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

The measured distance parameters were analyzed upon obesity level, age, and severity of OSAS (Table 2). The severity of obesity was classified upon WHO classification 2000 for the Asian-pacific population, and the age was categorized upon three groups (age 20 to 39, 40 to 59, and 60 to 79). In OSAS group, there were no significant differences of the depth and the width in all four landmarks by the severity of obesity, OSAS, and age. In the control group, no significant differences of metric parameters were shown in all four landmarks by the age and severity of obesity, except in point A, a tendency for the wider and deeper course of the lingual artery was observed by the increase in BMI (p<0.05).

Table 2.

Analysis of metric parameters of lingual artery by clinical characteristics

Discussion

Currently, many surgeons accept surgical approach for the correction OSAS when a conservative method (e.g.; weight loss, continuous positive airway pressure device, and etc.) have failed to achieve therapeutic target [16]. UPPP is a powerful surgical method to resolve velopharyngeal obstruction, however has its demerit in cases which glossopharyngeal obstruction plays main role for the upper airway narrowing [2,3]. Manipulation of BOT in combination with UPPP or exclusively is an effective surgical modality for resolving hypopharyngeal narrowing, having its efficacies proven in many previous studies [4,5,7]. When manipulating the BOT, protection of the lingual artery as well as other components in HLNVB should come as the first priority as well as effective volumetric reduction of the BOT in the same time. Injury to the lingual artery could result in serious complications such as perioperative bleeding, hematoma, profuse blood aspiration, and pseudoaneurysm thereby obstructing the upper and lower airway immediately after or during the surgery [6,8,10,17]. Therefore, the importance of precise understanding of the lingual artery precisely in OSAS patients cannot be overemphasized for the surgeon.

The lingual artery is a major artery branching out from the external carotid artery, and comes along as in the form of neurovascular bundle from the base of the tongue. HLNVB consists of lingual arteries, hypoglossal nerves, lingual nerves, and the lingual veins [8]. Posteriorly to circumvallate papillae, the lingual artery branches the dorsal lingual artery vertically towards to the dorsal surface of the tongue. At the level of the middle portion of the tongue, the lingual artery is divided into two minor arteries; the deep lingual artery located above the lingual frenulum; the sublingual artery located below the lingual frenulum, forming abundant vascular anastomosis on hypoglossal floor [18]. Lopez, et al. [12] have claimed three territories of the tongue by vascular supply; the dorsal portion supplied by the deep lingual artery; the ventral portion supplied by the sublingual artery; the basal portion supplied by the dorsal artery. When performing the functional surgery of the tongue, ventral portion (below lingual frenulum) are rarely manipulated, and the deep lingual artery is a relatively well reflected structure on the dorsal tongue. In contrary, the posterior to middle third portion of the tongue and the hypoglossal floor are considered as the “restrictive zone” when performing the functional surgery of the tongue, thereby making the dorsal lingual artery and post half of the lingual artery the most important structure among the course of the lingual artery [10,11].

Previously, attempts to identify the course of the lingual artery and its relations within the tongue were done by many studies [8,12,13,18-21]. The lingual artery was identified in ceCT images and in cadavers, therefore the depth and the width of the both lingual arteries were reported by scholars in Turkey, China and North America. Hou, et al. [11] have proposed the “V zone” for the safe surgery of the tongue in OSAS patients, and Wu, et al. [13] have analyzed the difference in the course of the lingual artery by the positional change of the tongue in Chinese population, and Cohen, et al. [10] and Ibrahim, et al. [21] have proven changes in the depth and the width of both lingual arteries by changes in the tongue position when retracted by a Feyh-Kastenbauer retractor, as if it was done in the setting for the transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Recently, Chang, et al. [17] prosed an intraoperative ultrasound imaging during TORS, which resulted in faster, safe, and more efficient surgical outcome. In 2021, Gualtieri, et al. [20] reported a new landmark on the ventral surface of the oropharynx to identify the lingual artery in the setting of a transoral surgery with resected head and neck specimen.

For the accurate comparison of the metric parameters between each study patients, a precise setting of each reference points was the single most important factor to consider upon study design. FC, located at the lingual surface of posterior one-third of the tongue, is an important landmark upon performing functional tongue surgeries. The feasibility of FC as a landmark for the evaluation of the lingual artery and the tongue had been validated by many studies over many decades [6,11-13,18,20,21]. Therefore, we have set FC as the main reference point, and three additional reference points were set as 2 cm anteriorly, 1 cm anteriorly, and 1 cm posteriorly to FC on the lingual surface. The reason that we have set each additional reference points on the lingual surface of the tongue is for easier orientation upon performing the surgery of the tongue. Clinically, it is the lingual surface of the tongue, not the lingual artery itself viewed by the surgeon when it comes to the surgical manipulation of the tongue [20]. By identifying the FC on the lingual surface, the surgeon might easily get oriented of the spatial relation between the tongue and the lingual artery beneath the lingual surface, therefore lessening the rate of complications related to the damage of HLNVB. However, the exact location of FC is not easily identified on CT image, therefore we have set the FC as the point at one-third of the middle and posterior junction of the tongue in CT image exactly the same way as Wu, et al. [13] have published.

Although the protocol for CT scan is different from the study conducted by Wu, et al. [13] in China, we have compared our results side by side with their study. In patients confirmed with OSAS by PSG, both studies showed similar width of the lingual artery (20.9 mm in our study and 20.1 mm in Wu’s study), however showed deeper course of the lingual artery in our study (30.7 mm in ours and 27.9 mm in Wu’s) at the level of FC. The metric evaluation of the tongue showed slightly thicker tongue (58.7 mm in ours and 55.9 mm in Wu’s), however shorter tongue (74.9 mm in ours and 83.5 mm in Wu’s) in our study. A cadaveric study from China have revealed the safety margin for midline glossectomy as 7 mm lateral from the midline and 10 mm deep from the lingual surface at FC level [22]. However, it should be reminded that these results were delivered from cadavers, not OSAS patients who tend to be more obese, and the cadaveric tissues were fixed which makes fatty component have shrink, thereby altering the vascular structures within the tongue.

The abnormal craniofacial anatomy in adult OSAS patients compared with normal population were previously studied by many researchers over a long period [23-25]. Metric analysis on the narrowing of upper airway due to shortening of bony structures and enlarged oropharyngeal structures such as palatine tonsil, BOT, and the tongue itself on physical examination and CT image were previously reported in many studies [23,24]. In addition, it had been argued patients with higher BMI tend to have more enlarged tongue with more abundant fat tissues in oropharyngeal structures, and these relationships were especially prevalent in Chinese population [19,25]. Similarly, our results showed the age-matched pairs of OSAS group had a thicker, wider, and longer length of the tongue compared with control, however these differences were no longer seen in BMI and age matched pairs (Table 1). Interestingly, the relative depth and width of the lingual arteries showed some significant differences in few reference points between the OSAS group and the control group. However, it should be considered that the OSAS group showed significant wider, thicker, and longer size of the tongue. Therefore, although some significant differences in the depth and the width of the lingual artery were shown in some reference points, it cannot be straightforwardly concluded that the course of the lingual artery is shallower in the anterior half of the tongue. Data shown in Table 2 shows no differences according to the level of obesity, age, and severity of OSAS were significantly related with the course of the lingual artery in both OSAS and control groups, supporting the fact that OSAS itself is an independent factor for shallower and narrower course of the lingual artery in the tongue, regardless of OSAS severity, age, and degree of obesity. The authors believe that these differences in the course of the lingual artery in the OSAS group and the control group are a result of the size difference of the tongue, however additional studies must be conducted to clear out this hypothesis.

Although we tried our best effort to minimize any bias and errors in the design of the study, we acknowledge some limitations as in following details. First, due to the fact that this study was a retrospective study, only one female OSAS patient was compatible for the inclusion criteria in the study period. To avoid any bias caused by the gender difference, we have excluded the female patient. Even though OSAS affects male population in Korea predominantly, it should be reminded that our data only represents the Korean male adult population. Second, in Wu [13] and Hou’s [11] study, measurement of the lingual artery shown on CT image was done in a similar way with our study. In their study, CTA was performed in all subjects, exclusively enhancing only the arteries whereas we have recruited patients CTA in addition with ceCT of the head and neck area which shows not only arterial structures but venous structures as well. Anatomically, the lingual artery courses close with the lingual vein, forming the HLNVB. Upon performing the surgery of the tongue, not only the lingual artery but also the HLNVB itself should be secured from injury, therefore we planned to include patients with ceCT image as well. Third, there is no evidence that the control group in our study does not possess OSAS, since no PSG was performed on these patients. Fourth, the majority of the control group had acute infectious condition of the palatine tonsil and epiglottis. Considering the fact that acute infection of those area can alter in mucosal swelling of the tongue base, there is a possibility that the lingual artery depth in control group were under or overestimated. Finally, due to the fact that our study is a retrospectively designed study, we were not able to clarify the spatial relation of the lingual artery and the tongue during various positional changes of the tongue, as suggested in publication by Lu, et al. [26] Therefore, the authors acknowledge that the data provided in this paper is insufficient to provide a definite safety margin for the functional surgery in OSAS patients.

Despite some limitations, our study has its own unique clinical merits. First, sex and age-matched randomized normal population were recruited for the comparison. No significant difference of patients’ age was observed, in contrary to the fact that a significantly higher BMI of OSAS group was evident than the control which indicates the randomization and the selection of control was successfully handled. Second, to avoid any possible measurement bias, the clinical characteristics of each subject were blinded upon measuring the metric parameters. Third, considering the fact that the numbers of patients who receive sleep surgeries are increasing yearly in Korea, establishing a comprehensive knowledge on the spatial relation between the lingual artery and the tongue in Korean male patients is in need. Since we are the first to report these findings in Korean population, we believe our study could act as a “cornerstone” in future clinical practice for many surgeons.

The course of lingual artery and the spatial relation between the tongue differs in Korean male OSAS patients compared with matched normal population. In OSAS patients, the lingual artery showed shallower depth anterior to FC, and the length between both lingual arteries narrower distance around the level of FC, compared to normal population. Age, degree of obesity and PSG derived parameters were not significantly related with the spatial relation between the tongue and the lingual artery. In practicing the functional surgery of the tongue, it should be considered that the “safety area” of the OSAS patients is different from the normal population.

Article information Continued